Skip to main content

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Explore
  • Interact
      • Clips Explore themed playlists of audio clips from the Archive.
      • Reuse Listen to creative reuses of Studs’ interviews.
      • Remix Combine audio from the Archive to create entirely new works.
  • Podcast
  • Classroom
  • Donate

00 / 00

Avram Nagid and Claude Ollier talk with Studs Terkel ; part 2

BROADCAST: Jan. 1, 1960 | DURATION: 00:12:37

Details

Broadcast Date
Jan. 1, 1960

Physical Format
2 sound tape reels (ca. 45 min.) : 7 in.

Duration
12 minutes, 37 seconds

Digital Format
WAV

Ownership
The Chicago History Museum

Language
English

Topics

Literature Philosophy Theater

People

Authors, Writers

Tags

Radio programs. Nagid, Avram--Interviews Ollier, Claude--Interviews Novelists--Interviews Audiotapes. Nagid, Avram,-- interviewee Ollier, Claude,-- interviewee

Related Programs

Elizabeth Garry discusses her show, "Victoria"

Nov. 12, 1979

Professor Adolph Baker, Jurgen Hinze, Professor Richard Lewenton and Father William Wallace discuss science and politics; part 1

Jan. 12, 1971

Derek Freeman discusses the book "Margaret Mead and Samoa"

Mar. 15, 1983

Interviewing Malcolm Barnes, Morris Carnovsky and Martha Schlamme.

May. 24, 1962

Interviewing Shel Silverstein

Dec. 12, 1963

Patrick Henry, Tricia Alexander in conversation with Studs Terkel

May. 21, 1986

Major Support Provided By
The Becca Kopf Memorial Circle of Friends
WFMT Radio Network & Chicago History Museum

This site is being managed by WFMT in partnership with the Chicago History Museum.

Library of Congress

In-kind digitization services of the Studs Terkel Radio Archive are provided by the Library of Congress.

National Endowment for the Humanities

The Studs Terkel Radio Archive has been made possible in part by a major grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities: Exploring the human endeavor.

Studs Terkel Radio Archive

All Programs About The Archive About Studs Supporters Contact

©2026 WFMT Radio Network | Site by Jell Creative

Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this web resource do not necessarily represent those of the National Endowment for the Humanities.