Skip to main content

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Explore
  • Interact
      • Clips Explore themed playlists of audio clips from the Archive.
      • Reuse Listen to creative reuses of Studs’ interviews.
      • Remix Combine audio from the Archive to create entirely new works.
  • Podcast
  • Classroom
  • Donate

00 / 00

Discussing phonetics and interviewing Alva Davis, Raven McDavid and Lee Pederson ; part 2

BROADCAST: 1963 | DURATION: 00:14:22

Details

Broadcast Date
1963

Physical Format
1 sound tape reel (ca. 60 min.) : 10 1/2 in. / 1 sound tape reel (ca. 60 min.) : 7 in.

Duration
14 minutes, 22 seconds

Ownership
The Chicago History Museum

Topics

Education

Tags

Davis, Alva. McDavid, Raven. Pederson, Lee. Phonetics Audiotapes. Radio programs WFMT (Radio station : Chicago, Ill.)

Related Programs

Interviewing educator Harold Taylor

May. 14, 1963

Leonard Bernstein discusses his career, music, and education

Feb. 1, 1985

Studs Terkel discusses race relations and economic disparity with four Chicago area women ; part 2

Jan. 27, 1965

Interviewing students at Metro High School on the Near North Side of Chicago

1970

Studs Terkel moderates and comments on a round-table debate about the Montessori educational theory

Nov. 3, 1964

Mildred Loomis discusses the green revolution and the back to the land movement ; part 2

Mar. 6, 1968

Major Support Provided By
The Becca Kopf Memorial Circle of Friends
WFMT Radio Network & Chicago History Museum

This site is being managed by WFMT in partnership with the Chicago History Museum.

Library of Congress

In-kind digitization services of the Studs Terkel Radio Archive are provided by the Library of Congress.

National Endowment for the Humanities

The Studs Terkel Radio Archive has been made possible in part by a major grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities: Exploring the human endeavor.

Studs Terkel Radio Archive

All Programs About The Archive About Studs Supporters Contact

©2026 WFMT Radio Network | Site by Jell Creative

Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this web resource do not necessarily represent those of the National Endowment for the Humanities.