Skip to main content

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Explore
  • Interact
      • Clips Explore themed playlists of audio clips from the Archive.
      • Reuse Listen to creative reuses of Studs’ interviews.
      • Remix Combine audio from the Archive to create entirely new works.
  • Podcast
  • Classroom
  • Donate

00 / 00

David Bradley discusses his novel "Chaneysville incident"

BROADCAST: Apr. 19, 1981 | DURATION: 00:53:46

Details

Broadcast Date
Apr. 19, 1981

Physical Format
1 sound tape reel (ca. 53.42 min.) : 10 1/2 in.

Duration
53 minutes, 46 seconds

Digital Format
WAV

Ownership
The Chicago History Museum

Language
English

Topics

Literature

People

Authors, Writers

Tags

Bradley, David Chaneysville incident. Authors, American. Audiotapes. Radio programs. WFMT (Radio station : Chicago, Ill.)

Related Programs

Stephen T. Sohmer talks with Studs Terkel

Aug. 31, 1966

Discussing the book "Love Life: Stories" with the author Bobbie Ann Mason

Mar. 29, 1989

James Baldwin discusses his book "The Evidence of Things Not Seen"

Nov. 22, 1985

Oriana Fallaci in conversation with Studs Terkel

Mar. 8, 1977

Discussing the book "The Long Affair: Thomas Jefferson and the French Revolution, 1785-1800 with Conor Cruise O'Brien.

Oct. 24, 1996

H. E. F. (Shag) Donahue and Nelson Algren discuss "Conversations with Nelson Algren"

Nov. 1, 1964

Major Support Provided By
The Becca Kopf Memorial Circle of Friends
WFMT Radio Network & Chicago History Museum

This site is being managed by WFMT in partnership with the Chicago History Museum.

Library of Congress

In-kind digitization services of the Studs Terkel Radio Archive are provided by the Library of Congress.

National Endowment for the Humanities

The Studs Terkel Radio Archive has been made possible in part by a major grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities: Exploring the human endeavor.

Studs Terkel Radio Archive

All Programs About The Archive About Studs Supporters Contact

©2026 WFMT Radio Network | Site by Jell Creative

Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this web resource do not necessarily represent those of the National Endowment for the Humanities.