Skip to main content

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Explore
  • Interact
      • Clips Explore themed playlists of audio clips from the Archive.
      • Reuse Listen to creative reuses of Studs’ interviews.
      • Remix Combine audio from the Archive to create entirely new works.
  • Podcast
  • Classroom
  • Donate

00 / 00

Discussing the triple revolution ; part 1

BROADCAST: Aug. 15, 1964 | DURATION: 01:19:08

Details

Broadcast Date
Aug. 15, 1964

Physical Format
1 sound tape reel (ca. 80 min.) : 10 1/2 in.

Duration
1 hour, 19 minutes, 8 seconds

Digital Format
WAV

Ownership
The Chicago History Museum

Language
English

Topics

Technology Working, Labor, Economy

Tags

WFMT (Radio station : Chicago, Ill.) Audiotapes. Radio programs.

Related Programs

Discussing the book, "Continuing the Good Life: Half a Century of Homesteading," with the authors, Scott and Helen Nearing

Apr. 22, 1979

Emily Kimbrough discusses her book "Forever Old, Forever New"

Jan. 1, 1965

Win Stracke, Bill Adelman, and Bill Neebe discuss May Day and the Haymarket Square Riot

Apr. 29, 1976

Discussing the book "Journey to Nowhere: The Saga of the New Underclass" with one of the book's creators, photographer Michael Williamson

May. 9, 1985

Max Holland discusses "When the machine stopped"

Mar. 12, 1990

John Kenneth Galbraith in conversation with Studs Terkel

Dec. 28, 1987

Major Support Provided By
The Becca Kopf Memorial Circle of Friends
WFMT Radio Network & Chicago History Museum

This site is being managed by WFMT in partnership with the Chicago History Museum.

Library of Congress

In-kind digitization services of the Studs Terkel Radio Archive are provided by the Library of Congress.

National Endowment for the Humanities

The Studs Terkel Radio Archive has been made possible in part by a major grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities: Exploring the human endeavor.

Studs Terkel Radio Archive

All Programs About The Archive About Studs Supporters Contact

©2026 WFMT Radio Network | Site by Jell Creative

Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this web resource do not necessarily represent those of the National Endowment for the Humanities.